Home » Hazardous Zone Monitoring: How Always-On PdM Reaches Your Most Dangerous Assets

Hazardous Zone Monitoring: How Always-On PdM Reaches Your Most Dangerous Assets

Industrial facility with large pipes and towers in the background, a warning sign for explosions on a fence in the foreground, and the text Hazardous Zones. Zero Blind Spots. overlaid on the image.

If you manage maintenance or reliability in a facility with hazardous zones, you already know the trade-off. The assets that carry the highest consequence of failure are often the least visible. Not because the data isn’t valuable. Because getting certified monitoring into explosive environments has always meant expensive infrastructure, operational disruption, or both.

That’s the monitoring desert problem. And for too long, it’s been treated as just the cost of doing business in Class I/II and Division I/II environments.

Why Hazardous Zones Become Monitoring Deserts

In standard plant environments, deploying continuous vibration monitoring is relatively straightforward. You mount sensors, connect to a gateway, and start seeing data. In a hazardous zone, that same process runs into a wall of real constraints:

  • Hot work permits. Any installation that could generate a spark in a classified area requires a permit, full PPE, and often SCBA requirements for H2S environments. That’s before a single sensor goes on a machine. The administrative burden alone keeps teams from even starting the conversation.
  • Specialized personnel. You need certified technicians for both the installation and any subsequent manual inspections. When that expertise is limited or stretched across multiple facilities, the frequency of manual rounds drops, and so does the quality of your asset intelligence.
  • Standard sensors can’t be deployed. Equipment that works perfectly in a general plant environment poses an ignition risk in a classified zone. That leaves your most critical assets with the least monitoring coverage.

The result: critical equipment in your highest-consequence areas gets checked manually, infrequently, and with significant risk to the people doing the checking.

The Real Cost of the Status Quo

When something goes wrong in a hazardous zone, the cost isn’t just the repair. It’s everything stacked on top of it.

Repair intervention in classified areas is roughly 10 times more complicated than in standard areas. Unplanned maintenance is already 3 times more expensive than planned maintenance under normal conditions. In hydrocarbon environments specifically, unplanned downtime can run $250,000 or more per hour. 

Add OSHA and EPA oversight, regulatory exposure, and reputational risk, and the cost of a failure in these areas isn’t a maintenance problem. It’s a business problem.

The frequency of manual inspections also creates gaps that continuous monitoring closes automatically. Fast-developing faults don’t wait for the next route. Vibration patterns that indicate a developing bearing issue, misalignment, or rotor imbalance can change significantly between scheduled checks. By the time a technician sees it in person, you’re already reactive.

A Compliance Argument Worth Making

There’s a hierarchy of controls embedded in both OSHA standards and API specifications that most reliability leaders already know. Elimination and substitution sit at the top. Engineering controls come next, and they’re preferred over administrative controls and PPE because they isolate people from the hazard rather than relying on human behavior to manage it.

Continuous, wireless monitoring is an engineering control. It doesn’t replace PPE or procedural safeguards, but it changes the risk profile of your most dangerous zones in a meaningful way. When your team can see what’s happening on a compressor or pump in a classified area without entering that area, you’ve moved the risk up the hierarchy. Fewer entries, fewer exposures, more information.

That argument resonates with EHS, compliance, and operations leadership alike. It’s not just about machine health. It’s about changing how your team interacts with risk.

What Always-On Monitoring in Hazardous Zones Actually Looks Like

Augury’s Machine Health Hazardous solution brings Industrial AI into Class I/II and Division I/II environments using intrinsically safe, certified wireless sensors. Here’s what that means practically:

  • No conduit runs, no hot work permits, no unplanned downtime. Augury’s wireless sensors install in minutes. Deployment doesn’t require facility shutdowns or expensive infrastructure retrofits, removing the biggest practical barrier to getting started.
  • Continuous data where it matters most. The Ranger Pro sensor captures triaxial vibration, surface temperature, and magnetic flux data 24/7 across your classified assets. It’s the same rich data stream your non-hazardous assets produce. Certified hardware, same platform.
  • One view across your entire facility. Safe and classified areas live in a single unified Machine Health platform. No duplicate workflows, no separate monitoring systems, no blind spots between your hazardous and non-hazardous coverage.
  • Safety compliance without sacrificing asset intelligence. The Cordant™ Edge Gateway carries ATEX, IECEx, and CSA certifications with an IP66/67 NEMA 4X enclosure. The Ranger Pro Gen 6 sensor is rated up to C1D1, with ISA100.11a wireless protocol reaching up to 150 meters to the gateway. Up to 3-5 year battery life, field-replaceable, no ongoing access required for routine operation.

The gap between safety compliance and comprehensive asset intelligence is smaller than most teams realize.

What This Looks Like in Practice

An EMEA petrochemical refinery that has been an Augury customer since 2021 moved their sites from manual route-based checks to continuous monitoring across both hazardous and non-hazardous assets.

The results:

  • MTBF increased from 823 days to 1,315 days: a 59% improvement
  • Maintenance costs reduced by up to 72% across monitored assets
  • 4x ROI within 6 months of deployment

The improvement wasn’t just about catching failures earlier, though that’s part of it. It’s about the shift from reacting to planning. When you continuously know the health status of your hazardous-zone assets, your team spends less time in those environments running manual checks and more time executing planned, targeted maintenance.

Hear It Straight From the Field


Fred Wasden spent years at Shell navigating exactly the environments we’ve been talking about. Hear him cover what actually works when you’re deploying PdM in explosive atmospheres. No theory, just field-tested experience shared in the webinar From Hot Work Permits to Continuous Coverage: Predictive Maintenance Certified for the Hazardous Zone.

Watch now

A Better Way of Working Starts Here